Source selection
We prioritise original sources such as operator terms, regulator records and official product documentation. A primary source may establish what an organisation states; it does not automatically prove a performance claim.
Independent reporting and attributed user accounts can add context. We do not copy another website’s rating or treat an unverified report as an established finding.
Claims and uncertainty
Material factual statements should be supported by a source appropriate to the claim. Language must distinguish a confirmed record, an operator statement, an allegation and an editorial inference.
We avoid invented statistics, testimonials, qualifications, reviewer identities and testing histories. If access to a source is limited, that limitation belongs in the review.
Testing and research tools
Desk research, interface observation, communication with support and completed financial transactions are different activities. They must not be described interchangeably.
Research and drafting tools may assist preparation. Their outputs are not sources. Factual claims still require verification, and no tool-generated text should be presented as personal experience.
Commercial relationships
Any paid placement, sponsorship or affiliate relationship must be disclosed clearly where relevant. A commercial arrangement must not require a favourable editorial finding or conceal a material restriction.
The current edition contains no casino affiliate links or sponsored listings. The funding disclosure must be updated if that changes.
Corrections and challenges
A correction request should identify the page, the specific statement in question, the proposed correction and an original source where possible. Please avoid sending identity documents, account credentials or private financial information.
We assess the evidence, correct material errors and add a note when an edit changes the meaning of a published assessment. A disagreement alone does not establish a factual error.
Our contact page explains the current submission arrangements. We do not promise a response time or operate an urgent support service.
Maintaining information
Terms, domains and legal circumstances can change. Review dates should reflect actual checks, not automatic date changes. Older findings must not be represented as newly verified.
Our method and this policy may evolve as the project develops. Material changes should be explained rather than applied silently to previously published findings.